Twelve years ago, the last time the Democrats lost a
presidential election, a not-very-bright college senior had this
to say about his disappointment:
But don’t let the
narrow difference in the Electoral College fool you. This wasn’t a close
election. When the new Congress convenes in January, the Republicans will have
double-digit advantages in the Senate and House of Representatives. Governors’
mansions and state legislatures remain, on the whole, firmly in their grasp. .
. .
So what gives?
A lot of things, but I would argue the
biggest problem is that most of us Lefties don’t understand people who base
their votes on “moral values.” Here in Ivory Tower academia, we like to make
fun of these people. With smug self-satisfaction, we mock them as backwards
simpletons who can’t read and base their opinions on (gasp!) The Bible.
Well the joke’s on us now, and we need
to regroup.
Two friends wrote me in the days that followed to take issue
with my analysis. One, Dave Weigel (now
of The Washington Post), challenged me for overreacting to a single
election. Realignment is hard, he said,
but there would be better days ahead for Democrats as they started to challenge
in areas traditionally held by Republicans.
The other, Greg Lowe, challenged me for abandoning my principles. Yes, moral-values voters had turned against
the Democrats, he conceded, but on the big “moral” issue of that election—gay
rights—we were right, and they were wrong.
We shouldn’t cede ground just because we had lost an election, he argued.
Two years later, Democrats took back Congress, and two years
after that, they had a near-filibuster-proof majority in the Senate to go with
the presidency and the House. Meanwhile,
it would take barely a decade for gay marriage to go from a Republican wedge
issue to a nationwide right.
It turns out two days after an election may not be the best
time to make predictions about American’s political future.
In the wake of this year’s election, a lot of people are
repeating my mistake of 2004. They’re
saying that Democrats are out of touch with the working class. They’re saying that “identity politics” is
(or should be) dead. They’re saying
that the left needs to reorient itself primarily or even exclusively around
economic messages. They’re wrong.
Like me 12 years ago, they’re overreacting to a single
electoral loss without looking at the broader picture. Yes, this hurts. But when 2
million more people vote for your candidate than the other guy, and you
gain seats in the House and Senate, it seems awfully strange to conclude that
it’s time for a massive overhaul of your entire platform and message. Democrats will remain competitive in Pennsylvania,
Michigan and Wisconsin in the near term.
And as demographics shift in the southwest, Democrats should continue to
make gains in Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. Democrats have won the popular vote in six of
the last seven presidential elections.
Let’s keep things in perspective.
But perhaps more importantly, those calling for a
significant messaging overhaul aren’t just overreacting. They’re ignoring the moral imperative for
liberals to continue to stand for the values—particularly equality and
diversity—that have defined our movement.
Yes, we should stand with the working class. But a lot of the working class is black or
Latino. A lot of the working class is
Muslim. An infrastructure bill is nice, but
it won’t mean much to people who end up deported or part of an immigrant
registry or on the wrong end of Trump’s plan to institute “law and order”—whatever
that means in a time of historically low crime rates.
Let me be blunter: You can’t
cozy up to Trump in the hopes that he’ll pass your favored school reforms
and ignore that he wants to deport millions of the kids you’re supposed to
serve.
You can’t separate the good white supremacists from the bad
white supremacists.
I’m all for listening to other people and understanding
their pain. Lord knows this election has
revealed that a lot of people across this country are suffering. But don’t tell me I have to give up on my
vision of America as diverse, welcoming and forward-looking because Hillary
Clinton lost the Electoral College.
This was a loss. For
a lot of people, it will prove a devastating loss. But for now, the only real option is to take
the hit, spit out the blood, and get up and fight. The war for our country is on.
1 comment:
† ††
Matthew 1
[17] So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.
Revelation 1
[20] The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NEW TESTAMENT BIBLE STUDY. Click here!
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Billionaires are BRILLIANT !
scratchwiththechickens@gmail.com
seeking benefactor
! Love the retro template 🙂✨
Post a Comment